|
Article should be read from this perspective. point of the Tax Ordinance, which provides for a kind of ineffectiveness - vis-à-vis the tax authority - of an agreement excluding matrimonial property. The latter provision allows the tax authority to enforce the tax arrears of one of the spouses that arose before the abolition of the community property, but only from those assets that were part of the community property until the conclusion of the property agreement. In other words, from the point of view of tax liabilities, only assets that have lost their character as community property due to.
The exclusion of community property may be treat as if they were still community property and thus may be the subject of tax philippines photo editor enforcement. Judgment of the Supreme Court - Chamber of Labour, Social Security and Public Affairs of June , , II UK In the case of contribution obligations, the legal effect of an agreement establishing the separation of property is the exclusion of the spouse's liability for the spouse's payer's contribution obligations arising after the date of conclusion of this agreement, while the conditions of Art. of the Act of August , , Tax Ordinance consolidat text: Journal of Laws of , item . Judgment of the Provincial Administrative Court in Białystok of April.
I SABk Third party liability is a legal institution that binds the effects of tax arrears to an entity other than the taxpayer. Therefore, there is no doubt that the regulation in question is exceptional. Third parties are liable for someone else's debt, but this liability may only result from a specific provision of the Act, and these persons only include the entities list in Art. - of the Act of August , - Tax Ordinance consolidat text: Journal of Laws of , item.
|
|